Surprisingly, given his obvious empathy with Koreans in general, Mr. Cumings disputes the common Korean belief that Japan simply plundered the peninsula during its long colonial annexation from 1910 to 1945. Instead he notes that while the Japanese imperialists may have been brutal and divisive, it was under their auspices that schools were built and an excellent network of roads and railroad lines constructed. In 1945, thanks to the Japanese, tiny Korea had half as many miles of roads as all of China.
Mr. Cumings also makes the point that during the Japanese occupation, the Koreans were perpetrators of repression as well as its victims. He writes that the ''comfort women,'' or sex slaves sent by Japan to accommodate its troops, were in many cases seized by fellow Koreans. That is one reason why the issue was buried in Korea for so many decades, and why it is so painful today.
>>478 @ 食文化は、地域民族固有のものと理解している。 A それを質問している。解らないならレスつけるな。 B Aに同じ C 意味不明 返答 @ Aに同じ A 質問したのは477 だろ? B Aに同じ C 「酒池肉林の惨事」ってことだな。 結論 設問者でもないのにしゃしゃりでるなよ!在日の評判が上がろうが 下がろうが、知ったこっちゃないね。